TeamG:
With first-time L-L checking sliding toward a lunar month on an "old" 1GHz Athlon,
we wonder how the Willamette and Itanium might further The Cause. Anyone
have guessimates on the numbers for these two, say at 1GHz?
Who, Me In A Hurry?
Stefanovic
[Wed 14 Jun 2000, Paul Leyland writes]
Today I found this number
3756482676803749223044867243823 with ECM andB1=10,000. It has two
factors, each of 16 digits, which could *not* havebeen found by trial
division in any reasonable time.
-
I use a program called "factor.exe", which
Hi all,
In order to learn hardware before leaving for college, I have taken a
full-time job at a local computer recycling place. Since I will be
attending college on a rather nice scholarship, I will have more money than
I am likely to need in the immediate future; through my work, I will
Stefan Struiker wrote:
With first-time L-L checking sliding toward a lunar month on an
"old" 1GHz Athlon, we wonder how the Willamette and Itanium might
further The Cause. Anyone have guessimates on the numbers for
these two, say at 1GHz?
I'd guessimate about 17.5-18 days for an exponent around
On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 01:40:26AM -0700, Jim Howell wrote:
This program runs on Windows, and can be downloaded from Chris Caldwell's main page,
at:
Just wanted to add that there is a Linux version as well -- I'd guess it's
available at the same place.
It didn't factor your number using P-1,
Hi,
Could you explain this to me ?
I am factoring Fermat numbers with ECM.
Is this relevant in this case ?
Thanks in advance,
Yann
Paul Leyland said:
As long as the coefficients of the curve and the starting point are
recorded, we can re-run exactly the same computation, with the small
primes
