Bruce Leenstra wrote:
What this list needs right now is a nice juicy math debate, so here goes:
I was reading the faq about P-1 factoring, and it talks about constructing a
'q' that is the product of all primes less than B1 (with some multiples?)
...
Right now Prime95 constructs a list of
In my personal account report of yesterday could be read:
***
Individual Account Report 11 Feb 2002 21:57 (Feb 11 2002 2:57PM
Pacific)
--- Exponents Assigned ---
Assignment overdue check-in is set at 60.0 days (0.0 days to expire)
prime fact current
Looks like someone finished it:
14421269 66 0x6E664B5F86CB66__12-Feb-02 08:04
Team_Prime_Rib DSheets_50
PS - I'm just thrilled because I found a factor of an exponent that beat
my previous record... 101 bit factor. I'm too lazy to look through the
cleared exponents list,
Well, someone did help you. The cleared exponents report contains the
following line:
14421269 66 0x6E664B5F86CB66__12-Feb-02 08:04
Team_Prime_Rib DSheets_50
Regards
Achim
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Ignacio Larrosa Cañestro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: [EMAIL
Answering my own question: (guess I wasn't so lazy after all)
14517229 103 F 9924470843259440116293839391239 10-Jan-02 15:35
00dbm Bertrand
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:mersenne-invalid-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Aaron Blosser
Sent: Tuesday,
Bruce Leenstra wrote:
What this list needs right now is a nice juicy math debate, so here goes:
I was reading the faq about P-1 factoring, and it talks about constructing
a
'q' that is the product of all primes less than B1 (with some multiples?)
...
Right now Prime95 constructs a list of
And for all other readers all(?) factors with more than 99 bits which are
part of the latest cleared exponents report:
12523547 101 F 3476706399795678069475753699633 12-Feb-02 12:30 madpoo
MainBoy
12736037 102 F 6150891764095478416426904114537 14-Jan-02 23:03 krypt
fmpc494
13459613 102
Hi,
At 11:41 AM 2/12/2002 -0800, Aaron Blosser wrote:
PS - I'm just thrilled because I found a factor of an exponent that beat
my previous record... 101 bit factor. I'm too lazy to look through the
cleared exponents list, so does anyone know what the largest factor is
that has been found by
Hi,
At 09:18 PM 2/12/2002 +0100, Achim Passauer wrote:
And for all other readers all(?) factors with more than 99 bits which are
part of the latest cleared exponents report:
14308961 103 F 9394020965332917865679071542783
There are two minor shortcoming in the prime95 to primenet protocol.
Okay, those are HUGE factors.
Have the predictions on the work eliminated by P-1 factoring been pretty
much confirmed by the # of large factors found? In other words, is the
extra processing time paying off?
I'd hazard a guess that the time saving is indeed appreciable, but I
wonder if anyone
Well,
After long and hard thought on this (approximately 30 seconds), I have
the following suggestion:
Each team account (could apply to accounts with just one machine as
well) should have 2 passwords.
A master password that could be used on the web pages to manage
exponents on all team
On 12 Feb 2002, at 12:41, Aaron Blosser wrote:
Have the predictions on the work eliminated by P-1 factoring been pretty
much confirmed by the # of large factors found? In other words, is the
extra processing time paying off?
I'd hazard a guess that the time saving is indeed appreciable,
On 12 Feb 2002, at 13:21, Aaron Blosser wrote:
After long and hard thought on this (approximately 30 seconds), I have
the following suggestion:
Each team account (could apply to accounts with just one machine as
well) should have 2 passwords.
A master password that could be used on the
HELP!
Until this evening I was expecting to see my first result from a LL test
on a 10,000,000-digit Mersenne number tomorrow morning. When I got
home from dinner tonight I was seeing a bunch of suminputs !=
sumoutputs, and after rebooting, the errors switched to round off [4]
0.40
Was I just
14 matches
Mail list logo
