Some time ago I raised the question on this list, whether the client's
choice of the E parameter was optimal in P-1 calculations. I gave a
somewhat handwavy argument in support of the claim that IF it is worthwhile
choosing E=4 over E=2, i.e., if the benefits in additional factors found
outweigh
On Sunday 09 March 2003 12:24, Daran wrote:
In the hope of more quickly collecting data, I have also redone, to 'first
time test' limits, every entry in pminus1.txt which had previously done to
B1=B2=1000, 2000, and 3000. For these exponents, all in the 1M-3M ranges,
the client was able to
Hi,
My CPU is: Celeron P4 1.7GHz (with 128kB cache)
Motherboard: ASUS P4S333-VM
Memory: 512kB DDR RAM
prime95 version: 23.2.1
OS: Win98 SE
I started a 'Torture Test'. It ran without fault about 8 hours.
After successful execution of 2048K FFT at beginning of
2560K FFT
a message 'Illegal
Chris,
You can avoid a lot of this manual labor by just putting this
line in prime.ini
SequentialWorkToDo=0
Read undoc.txt to see how it works. What this will do is, force P-1 to
be performed first.
Anurag
_
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 09:51:33PM -0800, Chris Marble wrote:
Daran wrote:
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 08:12:31PM -0800, Chris Marble wrote:
Daran wrote:
I like my stats but I could certainly devote 1 machine out of 20 to this.
If you're going to use one machine to feed the others,
