GIMPSers,
I'm up for joining a get-together in the San Jose/Mountain View area
depending on specific timing. Wasn't there a previous at the Tied House in
Mountain View? That would be great for me.
Todd Sauke
(Faithful list reader and one-machine cruncher, but infrequent poster.)
Spike
ange
earth's moment of inertia, and thus the length of a day, may make all of
the above irrelevant before the year 10500 anyway. . .
Cheers,
Todd Sauke
Ernst wrote:
Steinar Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, to complete the mess (I saw your message saying `ignore this',
but I want to
Alex,
The group you seek always has 2^n elements. All bit combinations are
possible.
(P = 2^p-1 is "minus one" in n-bit words. 2*P is minus two, etc. up to
2^n*P which is 0. All bit patterns occur.)
Todd Sauke
Now, I'm going to toss out an idea. I thought about this a few min
~ 10^88. 10^30 chances at hitting
a number ~10^88 to within 10^-6 leaves you several dozen orders of
magnitude short of a guarantee.
Best regards,
Todd Sauke
Unsubscribe list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm
s us to bypass
all of the heuristic arguments about logarithmic scaling of human selected
units for expressing quantities, and to directly DERIVE the law for
Mersennes, as opposed to heuristically generating it for the other cases.
Todd Sauke
Unsubscribe list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm
You might look at the integral of the
error histograms you get to see if they deviate subtly from the error
function. I was unable to load the raw data you referenced; I'm using the
OLD Excel 4.0. If you want to send me some raw data readable by Excel 4.0
I would be happy to look at it and look for h
, unfortunately a lot trickier than sending a list of numbers.
Todd Sauke
Unsubscribe list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm
capitate than a glomerule"
. . . Okaa
Todd Sauke
Unsubscribe list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm