Re: Mersenne: Compressing Prime95

2000-11-27 Thread Brian J. Beesley
On 26 Nov 00, at 15:06, Stephan T. Lavavej wrote: Saving space is always a good idea. This compression is actually better than ZIP compression, so when the distribution zipfile includes the smaller executable, it too becomes smaller: from 405953 bytes to 299756 bytes. This makes the

Re: Mersenne: Compressing Prime95

2000-11-27 Thread Stephan T. Lavavej
True, but... a) I prefer to download files in a form which can be unpacked by "standard" software - which includes zip - rather than relying on inbuilt executable code. This is more secure, and makes the download process less platform dependent. Well, any platform that can run Prime95's

Re: Mersenne: Compressing Prime95

2000-11-27 Thread Jeramy Ross
This 'Wonderful' compression technology maybe "Awesome"; however, MY main objection or perhaps philosophy towards all of this is that Prime95 is not a large piece of code. It takes a relatively small amount of time to download over a modem compared to other software items that we modem

Re: Mersenne: Compressing Prime95

2000-11-27 Thread Nathan Russell
Jeramy Ross wrote: This 'Wonderful' compression technology maybe "Awesome"; however, MY main objection or perhaps philosophy towards all of this is that Prime95 is not a large piece of code. It takes a relatively small amount of time to download over a modem compared to other

Mersenne: Compressing Prime95

2000-11-26 Thread Stephan T. Lavavej
I discovered something interesting. The most recent Prime95 executable is very large, 1212928 bytes long. However, if I use UPX (Ultimate Packer for eXecutables, upx.tsx.org) with the --best option, I can compress Prime95 down to 238542 bytes! That's about 20% of its original size. The