Mersenne: milestones

2001-03-12 Thread George Woltman
Hi all, There is another, and perhaps the most important reason, progress on double-checking milestones has been slow. When a double-check is sent in the server does not have enough information to know if a triple-check is needed. That info is in my master database - 3000 miles away.

Mersenne: Milestones?

2000-05-09 Thread Nathan Russell
If the PrimeNet assignments reports are to be believed, we have double-checked all exponents through 3M and proven M(2976221) and M(3021377) to be respectively the 36th and 37th primes in numeric order. Nathan Get Your

Re: Mersenne: Milestones?

2000-05-09 Thread Nathan Russell
From: Jeff Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Mersenne: Milestones? Date: Tue, 09 May 2000 12:37:31 -0400 We still have a handful of exponents to go. I was looking at the server's assignments out pages. I guess the assignments in question must be non-PrimeNet

Re: Mersenne: Milestones?

2000-05-09 Thread Eric Hahn
Nathan Russell wrote: From: Jeff Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Mersenne: Milestones? Date: Tue, 09 May 2000 12:37:31 -0400 We still have a handful of exponents to go. I was looking at the server's assignments out pages. I guess the assignments in question must

Re: Mersenne: Milestones?

2000-05-09 Thread Eric Hahn
Let me rephrase something from my last message: There should be 12 non-Primenet exponents left to finish testing (if they aren't already) to prove both M(2976221) and M(3021377) are the 36th and 37th Mersenne primes, respectively... Eric

Re: Mersenne: Milestones?

2000-05-09 Thread George Woltman
Hi, There are 19 exponents that need triple-checking. I've just assigned them to three volunteers. With luck, they'll all be finished up in a few weeks. Regards, George _ Unsubscribe list info --