Hi,
At 01:04 AM 1/25/00 +0100, Dieter Schmitt wrote:
>I'm running Prime95 on a PII-400 for 6 days (no overclocking) at
>exponent 9409271. It's produced several outputs concerning
>ROUND OFF ERRORS - the last one is ROUND OFF [0.5] > 0.4
>What to do now? Restart from iteration 1?
The first thi
Hi all,
I'm running Prime95 on a PII-400 for 6 days (no
overclocking) at exponent 9409271. It's produced several outputs concerning
ROUND OFF ERRORS - the last one is ROUND OFF [0.5] > 0.4
What to do now? Restart from iteration
1?
Regards
Dieter Schmitt
Hi all,
* Test 1 of 11, 400 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M19922945 using 1024 FFT
length.
* ERROR: ROUND OFF (0.499367) > 0.40
* Possible harware failure, consult the readme file.
This is a error massage I get somethimes from the prime95.exe. I wrote
"somethimes" cause few times 'self-test' p
Hi all,
At 08:13 PM 7/20/99 -0700, Daniel Swanson wrote:
>Iteration: 6128000/7812379, ERROR: ROUND OFF (0.4026489258) > 0.40
>[Tue Jul 20 16:35:33 1999]
>Disregard last error. Result is reproducible and thus not a hardware
problem.
>I consulted the readme file, but it wasn't very helpful. What
At 08:13 PM 1999/07/20 -0700, you ("Daniel Swanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)wrote:
I got the following set of messages today: [Tue Jul 20 16:15:19 1999]
Iteration: 6128000/7812379, ERROR: ROUND OFF (0.4026489258) > 0.40
Possible hardware failure, consult the readme file.
Continuing from last
I got the
following set of messages today:
[Tue Jul 20 16:15:19 1999]Iteration:
6128000/7812379, ERROR: ROUND OFF (0.4026489258) > 0.40Possible hardware
failure, consult the readme file.Continuing from last save file.[Tue Jul
20 16:35:33 1999]Disregard last error. Result is reproducible
