On 22 Aug 00, at 19:15, xqrpa wrote:
1. Forming a group with a few slow machines, then adding a slew of faster
ones bit by bit, causes an underestimate to be reported, but one
which gradually increases as the new machines report in.
Similarly if you run a whole lot of systems for
On Thu, 24 Aug 2000, Russel Brooks wrote:
Brian J. Beesley wrote:
PrimeNet credits you with CPU time if you use the automatic method to
report the result of an assignment but not if you use the manual
assignment form. It doesn't matter whether you got the assignment
using the automatic
I went to check my account just on the entropia web-sites individual
accounts report page. The default userid is challenge, I just hit enter
without thinking and this is the report
Account ID LL P90* Exponents Fact.P90 Exponents P90 CPU
CPU yrs LL Tested CPU yrs*
Gordon Spence wrote:
I went to check my account just on the entropia web-sites
individual accounts report page. The default userid is challenge,
I just hit enter without thinking and this is the report
[...SNIP...]
Can somebody, anybody, please explain how 1 cpu @ 500 and 1 @448 can
possibly
Just an additional note to my last message... Here's what I found
from a couple of top producers reports around the time:
Top Producers Report 22 Jan 2000 05:01 (Jan 21 2000 9:01PM Pacific)
86. challenge 36.031469 1.579106323.64
Top Producers Report 19 Feb 2000 02:01
- Original Message -
From: Eric Hahn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: gordon spence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 3:01 PM
Subject: Re: Mersenne: Re: Top Producers
Gordon Spence wrote:
I went to check my account just on the entropia web-sites
individual
