Re: Mersenne: idea for a new prime95 version, QA, primenet etc

2001-02-04 Thread Lars Lindley
> >> Nothing built by human hands is perfect, so, sure, the program could > >> be improved! Personally I'd like to see an optimization for Athlon; > >> at the expense of having to load different versions for different > >> processor types, I'd like to see seperate "streamlined" versions of > >> th

Re: Mersenne: idea for a new prime95 version, QA, primenet etc

2001-02-04 Thread Brian J. Beesley
On 3 Feb 2001, at 17:03, Jeff Woods wrote: > > >With increasing exponent size (and therefore run time), I'd like to > > >see PrimeNet evolve to track intermediate residues & also to be able > > >to coordinate parallel LL testing & double-checking, so that runs > > >which are going wrong can be st

Re: Mersenne: idea for a new prime95 version, QA, primenet etc

2001-02-03 Thread Russel Brooks
Jeff Woods wrote: > Then why is SETI@home so popular, when it shows little in the way of daily > statistics, either? Because Space/Aliens/E.T./Sci-Fi/etc is popular and SETI lets you participate, not just watch NASA/movies/others... That busy colorful SETI screensaver is also pretty neat to watc

Re: Mersenne: idea for a new prime95 version, QA, primenet etc

2001-02-03 Thread Nathan Russell
Ken Kriesel wrote: > At 09:23 AM 2/3/2001 -, "Brian J. Beesley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> George has announced the development of new FFT code optimised for >> Pentium 4. The FFT code is the true heart of the program: it's really >> hard for me to put into words just how much we all

Re: Mersenne: idea for a new prime95 version, QA, primenet etc

2001-02-03 Thread Nathan Russell
Jeff Woods wrote: > At 04:48 PM 2/3/01 -0500, you wrote: > >> After hanging around the Anandtech DC forum for awhile, I'm convinced >> that this completion time "problem" might be GIMPS biggest hurdle to >> getting more participation. Very few "loonies" like us are willing >> to wait 14 mont

Re: Mersenne: idea for a new prime95 version, QA, primenet etc

2001-02-03 Thread Kel Utendorf
At 17:04 02/03/2001 -0500, Jeff Woods wrote: >At 04:48 PM 2/3/01 -0500, you wrote: > >>After hanging around the Anandtech DC forum for awhile, I'm convinced that >>this completion time "problem" might be GIMPS biggest hurdle to getting >>more participation. Very few "loonies" like us are wil

Re: Mersenne: idea for a new prime95 version, QA, primenet etc

2001-02-03 Thread Jeff Woods
At 04:48 PM 2/3/01 -0500, you wrote: >After hanging around the Anandtech DC forum for awhile, I'm convinced that >this completion time "problem" might be GIMPS biggest hurdle to getting >more participation. Very few "loonies" like us are willing to wait 14 >months for the calculation of one r

Re: Mersenne: idea for a new prime95 version, QA, primenet etc

2001-02-03 Thread Jeff Woods
At 02:57 PM 2/3/01 -0600, you wrote: > >With increasing exponent size (and therefore run time), I'd like to > >see PrimeNet evolve to track intermediate residues & also to be able > >to coordinate parallel LL testing & double-checking, so that runs > >which are going wrong can be stopped for inve

Re: Mersenne: idea for a new prime95 version, QA, primenet etc

2001-02-03 Thread Kel Utendorf
At 14:57 02/03/2001 -0600, Ken Kriesel wrote: >In the QA effort, we've seen a few instances already of errors caught >midway by doing a manual/email version of this. Brian Beesley had an error >detected this way in his run of a double-check of a 10-megadigit exponent. >This exponent takes

Re: Mersenne: idea for a new prime95 version, QA, primenet etc

2001-02-03 Thread Ken Kriesel
At 09:23 AM 2/3/2001 -, "Brian J. Beesley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >George has announced the development of new FFT code optimised for >Pentium 4. The FFT code is the true heart of the program: it's really >hard for me to put into words just how much we all owe to George for >his unstint