NOW it does, after the official announcement Remember
when Roland found M37? Someone found a 0x000
residue in the report and beat George to the punch, so Scott
modified the reports so that they would NOT post a zero
residue automatically. So THIS time, when word came that
On Mon, Jul 05, 1999 at 09:50:42PM -0700, Eric Hahn wrote:
(Note to Scott - create a dummy non-zero residue a stick it
in the cleared exponents report).
Too late!! The Cleared Exponents Report reads:
I think he meant `next time' :-)
/* Steinar */
NOW it does, after the official announcement Remember when Roland
found M37? Someone found a 0x000 residue in the report and
beat George to the punch, so Scott modified the reports so that they would
NOT post a zero residue automatically. So THIS time, when word came that
I'm curious - had this already been tested by
someone else using the defective v17 software?
Randy Given
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.aol.com/GivenRandy
public key at http://members.aol.com/GivenRandy/pgpkey.asc
Unsubscribe
At 07:19 05.07.99 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm curious - had this already been tested by
someone else using the defective v17 software?
No.
/* Steinar */
Unsubscribe list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm
The page belongs to a previous record holder...
Took me about 30 seconds to find it.
It's nice to see a thirty-eighth line in /root/math/ref/mers...
-Lucas Wiman
Unsubscribe list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm
At 02:21 01.07.99 -0400, Lucas Wiman wrote:
The page belongs to a previous record holder...
Took me about 30 seconds to find it.
It's nice to see a thirty-eighth line in /root/math/ref/mers...
I didn't! Am I _that_ bad at searching the web? I looked at Gordon's page
and Roland's page (found
At 07:17 01.07.99 -0400, Lucas Wiman wrote:
All right, here's a hint: he held the record for largest prime, which was
also
a non-mersenne prime. Check the largest prime by year...
David `Mr. Cray' himself? :-)
/* Steinar */
At 07:17 01.07.99 -0400, Lucas Wiman wrote:
You aren't searching for the right people. He didn't say it was a *GIMPS*
record holder. You've just gotta know where to look.
Found it -- 2^6972593-1 :-)
Well, finding that in 30 seconds must mean you knew it was there, or you
were incredibly
The page belongs to a previous record holder...
Took me about 30 seconds to find it.
It's nice to see a thirty-eighth line in /root/math/ref/mers...
I didn't! Am I _that_ bad at searching the web? I looked at Gordon's page
and Roland's page (found nothing), but couldn't find Joel's page.
You
At 08:32 01.07.99 -0300, Nicolau C. Saldanha wrote:
Try the other record holders, there are not too many of them.
You can find links to their home pages at www.mersenne.org.
http://www.mat.puc-rio.br/~nicolau
Don't worry, I've found it already. Looks like I lost the guessing game...
/* Steinar
Took me a bit longer but has M38 has 2098960 digits ;-)
At 02:21 01.07.99 -0400, Lucas Wiman wrote:
The page belongs to a previous record holder...
Took me about 30 seconds to find it.
It's nice to see a thirty-eighth line in /root/math/ref/mers...
I didn't! Am I _that_ bad at searching the
At 14:10 01.07.99 +0200, Hoogendoorn, Sander wrote:
Try Landon Curt Noll
Yes, I tried it after I send that message. The exponent is hardly secret
now that even I can find it :-)
/* Steinar */
Unsubscribe list info --
Found it -- 2^6972593-1 :-)
Well, finding that in 30 seconds must mean you knew it was there, or you
were incredibly lucky... Does George know about this?
Lucky. I went to yahoo.com and typed in 38th, and then stopped.
I realized that I should look for the record holders, and
through some
At 08:04 AM 7/1/99 -0400, you wrote:
Well either that or I am *SEARCHER SUPREME*, but then I would have been
the first to find it, on Landon's site.
I would assume that George would know since he probably gave the exponent
to him in the first place.
There is a very short list of people that
On Wed, Jun 30, 1999 at 07:43:33AM -0400, St. Dee wrote:
I'll guess p~=6,740,001 :-)
I'd recommend using a prime, but that's your problem, of course. Well,
nobody has gone _over_ your guess, so it probably doesn't matter. (In
all other case, choosing the highest non-checked prime above
This is a pretty good article... a few things I didn't know; someone
should add a history section to the FAQ, for those of us that haven't been
around too long.
;-)
On the other hand, there are a few things that could be polished up in the
article... to quote:
"Although in theory an infinite
On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, Chris Nash wrote:
Hi folks,
As we all impatiently await verification of M38(?) a really stupid thought
occurred to me, so apologies if it's a lot more ignorant than Chuck W.'s
"definitive" post on the subject of GIMPS v SETI, or distributed computing
in general.
If
18 matches
Mail list logo
