On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:37:49 -0700, Kenneth Graunke
wrote:
> v.3. "This time for sure!"
> I've cleaned up the series quite a bit, squashing some patches and
> splitting others out to try and make it easier to review and avoid
> breakage. As such, I've dropped most of the R-b's since this series
On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 05:47:18PM +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A "Mesa/Gallium state of the art and perspectives" would be awesome!
... but who will step up to do it?
Luc Verhaegen.
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http:
Hi,
A "Mesa/Gallium state of the art and perspectives" would be awesome!
-Ilyes
On Oct 1, 2011 2:14 PM, "Luc Verhaegen" wrote:
> So far we have:
> * Martin Peres - Nouveau
> * Alon Levy - Xspice
> * Chris Wilson - Cairo
> * Kai Uwe Behrmann - Colormanagement with compositors.
> * Daniel Vetter -
2011/9/30 Stéphane Marchesin :
> Us poor souls who cross compile mesa want to be able to specify which
> pkg-config to pick, or at least just change one place.
I just checked, and we're already using PKG_PROG_PKG_CONFIG in
configure.ac, so this patch looks right.
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner
__
On 09/30/2011 06:54 PM, Stéphane Marchesin wrote:
Us poor souls who cross compile mesa want to be able to specify which
pkg-config to pick, or at least just change one place.
---
configs/default |1 +
configs/freebsd-dri |4 ++--
On 09/30/2011 06:45 PM, Paul Berry wrote:
Commit d1fda903 (radeon: Drop mapping we were doing around
glGetTexImage()) removed the common Radeon source file
radeon_tex_getimage.c, and pulled it out of the r200, r300, r600, and
radeon makefiles. But it left behind the symlinks that were being
used
So far we have:
* Martin Peres - Nouveau
* Alon Levy - Xspice
* Chris Wilson - Cairo
* Kai Uwe Behrmann - Colormanagement with compositors.
* Daniel Vetter - DRM futures.
Only a single speaker is still lacking, and because I didn't make noise
the last few days, I will wait until 1st of Okt 2011 e
2011/9/30 Jeremy Huddleston :
>> Er, sure, but that brings up my second point: the GPL restricts
>> redistribution, not use, so you are not required to "accept it" to use
>> GPL tools.
>
> Again, mirroring Alan's comment. IANAL. I just do what the Lawyers
> say. I am told not to touch GLPv3 wit
