Hi,
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 01:44:18PM +0100, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
> The main reason I want to standardize on an English variant is that I'm
> trying create a word-list for domain-specific/technical language to
> detect spelling mistakes in the docs more easily.
Are you aware of codespell[1]?
Correction, we have 7 candidates for 4 positions.
I seem to have overlooked Walter Harms's nomination email. My sincerest
apologies. His personal affiliation, statement of contribution, and
personal statement are below.
The full slate of candidates can be found at
On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 at 13:08, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On March 16, 2021 05:06:53 Daniel Stone wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 20:54, Jason Ekstrand
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Three comments:
>>>
>>> 1. +1
>>> 2. Khronos has generally standardized on American English in their
>>> specs so I guess
On March 16, 2021 05:06:53 Daniel Stone wrote:
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 20:54, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
Three comments:
1. +1
2. Khronos has generally standardized on American English in their
specs so I guess that provides some sort of prior art or something.
3. I'd generally be a fan of
Just one detail to fill in:
I just got a question on #dri-devel if this suggestion would place an
additional burden on most developers to additionally look up every word
of new documentation to see if it's US or UK English.
I'm not proposing to place any additional burden on people writing
docs.
On Tue, 2021-03-16 at 10:06 +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 20:54, Jason Ekstrand
> wrote:
> > Three comments:
> >
> > 1. +1
> > 2. Khronos has generally standardized on American English in their
> > specs so I guess that provides some sort of prior art or something.
> >
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 20:54, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> Three comments:
>
> 1. +1
> 2. Khronos has generally standardized on American English in their
> specs so I guess that provides some sort of prior art or something.
> 3. I'd generally be a fan of encouraging American spellings in common
>
On Mon, 2021-03-15 at 13:44 +0100, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
> TLDR; I'm proposing to standardize on US English in our public-facing
> documentation.
+1
J.A.
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
You are right, building with -Dx11=disabled don't require any X11 dependency.
Thanks a lot !On Mar 13, 2021 2:52 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> On 2021-03-12 7:46 p.m., Quentin SCHIBLER wrote:
> > GLVND depends on several X librairies.
>
> Even if you build libglvnd with -Dx11=disabled ?
>
>
>
