Re: [Mesa-dev] [RFC] Concrete proposal to split classic

2021-06-15 Thread Emma Anholt
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 8:16 PM Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 8:46 PM Timothy Arceri wrote: > > > > On 6/16/21 11:03 AM, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > > > I'm bringing this up via e-mail so it gets a wider audience. Given how will > > crocus is working at this point, is like to

Re: [Mesa-dev] [RFC] Concrete proposal to split classic

2021-06-15 Thread Timothy Arceri
On 6/16/21 1:16 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote: On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 8:46 PM Timothy Arceri wrote: On 6/16/21 11:03 AM, Jason Ekstrand wrote: I'm bringing this up via e-mail so it gets a wider audience. Given how will crocus is working at this point, is like to propose we hold off for about

Re: [Mesa-dev] [RFC] Concrete proposal to split classic

2021-06-15 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 8:46 PM Timothy Arceri wrote: > > On 6/16/21 11:03 AM, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > I'm bringing this up via e-mail so it gets a wider audience. Given how will > crocus is working at this point, is like to propose we hold off for about > three more releases before we drop

Re: [Mesa-dev] [RFC] Concrete proposal to split classic

2021-06-15 Thread Timothy Arceri
On 6/16/21 11:03 AM, Jason Ekstrand wrote: I'm bringing this up via e-mail so it gets a wider audience. Given how will crocus is working at this point, is like to propose we hold off for about three more releases before we drop classic. This next release, 21.2, we'll have crocus as an option

Re: [Mesa-dev] [RFC] Concrete proposal to split classic

2021-06-15 Thread Jason Ekstrand
I'm bringing this up via e-mail so it gets a wider audience. Given how will crocus is working at this point, is like to propose we hold off for about three more releases before we drop classic. This next release, 21.2, we'll have crocus as an option with i965 as the default. There will also be

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 0/6] dma-buf: Add an API for exporting sync files (v12)

2021-06-15 Thread Christian König
Hi Jason & Daniel, maybe I should explain once more where the problem with this approach is and why I think we need to get that fixed before we can do something like this here. To summarize what this patch here does is that it copies the exclusive fence and/or the shared fences into a