Am 23.06.21 um 17:12 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 05:07:17PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
Am 23.06.21 um 17:03 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 04:58:27PM +0200, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 4:50 PM Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23,
Am 23.06.21 um 17:03 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 04:58:27PM +0200, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 4:50 PM Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 4:02 PM Christian König
wrote:
Am 23.06.21 um 15:49 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at
Am 23.06.21 um 15:49 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 3:44 PM Christian König
wrote:
Am 23.06.21 um 15:38 schrieb Bas Nieuwenhuizen:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 2:59 PM Christian König
wrote:
Am 23.06.21 um 14:18 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 11:45 AM Bas
Am 23.06.21 um 15:38 schrieb Bas Nieuwenhuizen:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 2:59 PM Christian König
wrote:
Am 23.06.21 um 14:18 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 11:45 AM Bas Nieuwenhuizen
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 6:55 PM Daniel Vetter wrote:
WARNING: Absolutely untested
Am 23.06.21 um 14:18 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 11:45 AM Bas Nieuwenhuizen
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 6:55 PM Daniel Vetter wrote:
WARNING: Absolutely untested beyond "gcc isn't dying in agony".
Implicit fencing done properly needs to treat the implicit fencing
slots
Docs for struct dma_resv are fairly clear:
"A reservation object can have attached one exclusive fence (normally
associated with write operations) or N shared fences (read
operations)."
https://dri.freedesktop.org/docs/drm/driver-api/dma-buf.html#reservation-objects
Furthermore a review across
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 05:07:17PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Am 23.06.21 um 17:03 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 04:58:27PM +0200, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 4:50 PM Daniel Vetter
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 4:02 PM Christian
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 04:58:27PM +0200, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 4:50 PM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 4:02 PM Christian König
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Am 23.06.21 um 15:49 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > > > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 3:44 PM Christian
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 4:50 PM Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 4:02 PM Christian König
> wrote:
> >
> > Am 23.06.21 um 15:49 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 3:44 PM Christian König
> > > wrote:
> > >> Am 23.06.21 um 15:38 schrieb Bas Nieuwenhuizen:
> > >>>
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 4:02 PM Christian König
wrote:
>
> Am 23.06.21 um 15:49 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 3:44 PM Christian König
> > wrote:
> >> Am 23.06.21 um 15:38 schrieb Bas Nieuwenhuizen:
> >>> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 2:59 PM Christian König
> >>> wrote:
> Am
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 3:44 PM Christian König
wrote:
>
> Am 23.06.21 um 15:38 schrieb Bas Nieuwenhuizen:
> > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 2:59 PM Christian König
> > wrote:
> >> Am 23.06.21 um 14:18 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> >>> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 11:45 AM Bas Nieuwenhuizen
> >>> wrote:
>
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 2:59 PM Christian König
wrote:
>
> Am 23.06.21 um 14:18 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 11:45 AM Bas Nieuwenhuizen
> > wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 6:55 PM Daniel Vetter
> >> wrote:
> >>> WARNING: Absolutely untested beyond "gcc isn't dying in
Am 22.06.21 um 18:54 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
Docs for struct dma_resv are fairly clear:
"A reservation object can have attached one exclusive fence (normally
associated with write operations) or N shared fences (read
operations)."
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 11:45 AM Bas Nieuwenhuizen
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 6:55 PM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > WARNING: Absolutely untested beyond "gcc isn't dying in agony".
> >
> > Implicit fencing done properly needs to treat the implicit fencing
> > slots like a funny kind of IPC
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 6:55 PM Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> WARNING: Absolutely untested beyond "gcc isn't dying in agony".
>
> Implicit fencing done properly needs to treat the implicit fencing
> slots like a funny kind of IPC mailbox. In other words it needs to be
> explicitly. This is the only
15 matches
Mail list logo