On Thu, 17 Jul 2014, Jan Vesely wrote:
> why not use __attribute__ ((aligned(X))) for explicit padding?
That’s ① GCC-specific and ② relies on environmental guarantees
that cannot always be given (e.g. you cannot align a struct
more than the stack alignment if it is ever passed on the
stack; for s
etty output that accentuates irrelevant
detail in the program, which is as sensible as putting all the prepositions
in English text in bold font. -- Rob Pike in "Notes on Programming in C"From: Thorsten Glaser ___
mesa-dev mailing list
mes
On Thu, 17 Jul 2014, Eero Tamminen wrote:
> While effect of unaligned accesses is normally invisible,
No, the compiler is inserting padding here silently.
We call this “implicit padding”. The problem with it
is that this padding is architecture-dependent, and
some platforms have other alignment r
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Absolutely. Could the upstream Mesa developers maybe apply the patch
> as well?
They are not taking us for real, see #728053 for their feedback…
> We're putting lots of efforts into the m68k port and we have many
> users who love running De
Matt Turner dixit:
>[sarcasm]How well does NV84 video decoding work on m68k these days
>anyway?[/sarcasm]
Dunno, but people do use PCI ATI Radeon cards on Ataris
(not yet with Linux for lack of a driver for the PCI bridge,
but can’t be long now that they already wrote one for the
USB host control
werfen,
⎜wenn er beim booten das chipmunks intro spielt
-- Forwarded message --
From: Julien Cristau
Message-ID: <20131106151538.gg4...@betterave.cristau.org>
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.00 required=0.90
To: Thorsten Glaser , 728...@bugs.debian.org
Date: Wed, 6 No
