https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62357
Roland Scheidegger srol...@vmware.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62357
--- Comment #14 from Roland Scheidegger srol...@vmware.com ---
(In reply to comment #13)
(In reply to comment #12)
This is fixed with 5af7b45986d1b56c568ebe9c3a40d48853e2e9ff.
Not sure if the testcase would be that useful as a piglit test.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62357
--- Comment #15 from José Fonseca jfons...@vmware.com ---
(In reply to comment #14)
(In reply to comment #13)
(In reply to comment #12)
This is fixed with 5af7b45986d1b56c568ebe9c3a40d48853e2e9ff.
Not sure if the testcase would be that
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62357
José Fonseca jfons...@vmware.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jfons...@vmware.com
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62357
--- Comment #6 from Brian Paul bri...@vmware.com ---
My piglit test was with LLVM 3.2.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
mesa-dev mailing list
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62357
--- Comment #7 from Roland Scheidegger srol...@vmware.com ---
After a quick look at the generated IR, it indeed seems broken.
However, it is broken the opposite way, that is the early exit path is ok but
if the path isn't taken it will pick zero
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62357
--- Comment #8 from Roland Scheidegger srol...@vmware.com ---
Looks like we unconditionally return when we see a return not in a function.
Some trivial attempt at fixing that seems to work but I'm not quite sure if
it's right or if we need to do
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62357
--- Comment #9 from Brian Paul bri...@vmware.com ---
Nice find, Roland. Do you want fix up my test case and put it into piglit?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62357
--- Comment #10 from Roland Scheidegger srol...@vmware.com ---
Hmm I just noticed this doesn't actually work. Instead of not executing the
code after the conditional, the result will now always be as if the condition
passed, so the original
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62357
--- Comment #11 from Roland Scheidegger srol...@vmware.com ---
Created attachment 76596
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=76596action=edit
another testcase
Here's another test case. With this one you can actually see if both
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62357
--- Comment #1 from Brian Paul bri...@vmware.com ---
Created attachment 76543
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=76543action=edit
piglit shader test to exercise the bug
Do you happen to know which version of Mesa this is
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62357
--- Comment #2 from Brian Paul bri...@vmware.com ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Run with:
bin/shader_runner
tests/spec/glsl-1.10/execution/fs-return-in-main.shader_test -auto
Err, just:
bin/shader_runner fs-return-in-main.shader_test -auto
If
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62357
--- Comment #3 from drag...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Created attachment 76543 [details]
piglit shader test to exercise the bug
Do you happen to know which version of Mesa this is happening with? I can't
tell from the gnome
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62357
--- Comment #4 from drag...@gmail.com ---
FWIW this was using LLVM 3.2 as well.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
mesa-dev mailing list
14 matches
Mail list logo
