[Mesa-dev] [Bug 89599] symbol 'x86_64_entry_start' is already defined when building with LLVM/clang

2016-07-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89599 --- Comment #14 from Tomasz Paweł Gajc --- (In reply to Matt Turner from comment #11) > I sent a modified version of Tomasz's patch last week to mesa-dev. > > Would anyone like to test it? > > [PATCH] mapi: Massage code to

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 89599] symbol 'x86_64_entry_start' is already defined when building with LLVM/clang

2016-07-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89599 Matt Turner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 89599] symbol 'x86_64_entry_start' is already defined when building with LLVM/clang

2016-07-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89599 --- Comment #13 from Matt Turner --- Thanks all. I've pushed the patch: commit 5ec140c17b54c25920091501b665b9aa809cc5e8 Author: Matt Turner Date: Mon Jul 11 10:44:25 2016 -0700 mapi: Massage code

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 89599] symbol 'x86_64_entry_start' is already defined when building with LLVM/clang

2016-07-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89599 --- Comment #12 from austinengl...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Matt Turner from comment #11) > I sent a modified version of Tomasz's patch last week to mesa-dev. > > Would anyone like to test it? > > [PATCH] mapi:

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 89599] symbol 'x86_64_entry_start' is already defined when building with LLVM/clang

2016-07-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89599 --- Comment #11 from Matt Turner --- I sent a modified version of Tomasz's patch last week to mesa-dev. Would anyone like to test it? [PATCH] mapi: Massage code to allow clang to compile. -- You are receiving this mail

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 89599] symbol 'x86_64_entry_start' is already defined when building with LLVM/clang

2016-07-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89599 Vinson Lee changed: What|Removed |Added CC||v...@freedesktop.org

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 89599] symbol 'x86_64_entry_start' is already defined when building with LLVM/clang

2016-07-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89599 austinengl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 89599] symbol 'x86_64_entry_start' is already defined when building with LLVM/clang

2016-01-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89599 --- Comment #9 from Vinson Lee --- (In reply to Matt Turner from comment #6) > What do I have to do to reproduce this? Mesa builds with clang (3.7.0) > fine for me. I've built with clang occasionally for a few years and >

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 89599] symbol 'x86_64_entry_start' is already defined when building with LLVM/clang

2016-01-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89599 --- Comment #7 from Armin K --- (In reply to Matt Turner from comment #6) > What do I have to do to reproduce this? Mesa builds with clang (3.7.0) > fine for me. I've built with clang occasionally for a few years and > have

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 89599] symbol 'x86_64_entry_start' is already defined when building with LLVM/clang

2016-01-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89599 --- Comment #6 from Matt Turner --- What do I have to do to reproduce this? Mesa builds with clang (3.7.0) fine for me. I've built with clang occasionally for a few years and have never encountered this problem. -- You are

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 89599] symbol 'x86_64_entry_start' is already defined when building with LLVM/clang

2016-01-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89599 --- Comment #8 from Tomasz Paweł Gajc --- I've build mesa-11.1.1 without a patch from comment #2. make[4]: Entering directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/mesa-11.1.1/src/mapi' /bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 89599] symbol 'x86_64_entry_start' is already defined when building with LLVM/clang

2015-10-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89599 --- Comment #5 from Marek Olšák --- The patch should be sent to the mailing list. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 89599] symbol 'x86_64_entry_start' is already defined when building with LLVM/clang

2015-04-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89599 --- Comment #4 from Tomasz Paweł Gajc tpg...@gmail.com --- Created attachment 115318 -- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=115318action=edit Potential fix -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 89599] symbol 'x86_64_entry_start' is already defined when building with LLVM/clang

2015-04-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89599 --- Comment #3 from yunl...@chromium.org --- Can we land this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. ___ mesa-dev mailing list

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 89599] symbol 'x86_64_entry_start' is already defined when building with LLVM/clang

2015-04-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89599 --- Comment #2 from Tomasz Paweł Gajc tpg...@gmail.com --- This patch fixes this issues: https://abf.io/openmandriva/mesa/blob/master/mesa-10.5.2-hide-few-symbols-to-workaround-clang.patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 89599] symbol 'x86_64_entry_start' is already defined when building with LLVM/clang

2015-04-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89599 Tomasz Paweł Gajc tpg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|symbol 'x86_64_entry_start' |symbol