On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 10:34 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 5:23 AM, Oded Gabbay wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
>>> On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 06:41:56PM +, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 10 December 2015 at 08:42, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> On
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 5:23 AM, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 06:41:56PM +, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>> On 10 December 2015 at 08:42, Oded Gabbay wrote:
>>> > On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 8:30 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>>> >> On T
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 06:41:56PM +, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 10 December 2015 at 08:42, Oded Gabbay wrote:
>> > On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 8:30 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:37 PM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
>> >>> Ch
On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 06:41:56PM +, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 10 December 2015 at 08:42, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 8:30 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> >> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:37 PM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> >>> Change the __m128i variables to be volatile so gcc 4.9 won't opt
On 10 December 2015 at 08:42, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 8:30 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:37 PM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
>>> Change the __m128i variables to be volatile so gcc 4.9 won't optimise
>>> all of them out with -O1 or greater. The _mm_set1_epi32/pin
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 8:30 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:37 PM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
>> Change the __m128i variables to be volatile so gcc 4.9 won't optimise
>> all of them out with -O1 or greater. The _mm_set1_epi32/pinsrd calls
>> still get optimised out but now there is a
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:39:30PM +0200, Oded Gabbay wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Emil Velikov
>> wrote:
>> > On 9 December 2015 at 05:37, Jonathan Gray wrote:
>> >> Change the __m128i variables to be volatile so gcc 4.9 won't
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:39:30PM +0200, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> > On 9 December 2015 at 05:37, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> >> Change the __m128i variables to be volatile so gcc 4.9 won't optimise
> >> all of them out with -O1 or greater. The _mm_se
On 9 December 2015 at 11:39, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 9 December 2015 at 05:37, Jonathan Gray wrote:
>>> Change the __m128i variables to be volatile so gcc 4.9 won't optimise
>>> all of them out with -O1 or greater. The _mm_set1_epi32/pinsrd
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 9 December 2015 at 05:37, Jonathan Gray wrote:
>> Change the __m128i variables to be volatile so gcc 4.9 won't optimise
>> all of them out with -O1 or greater. The _mm_set1_epi32/pinsrd calls
>> still get optimised out but now there is at
On 9 December 2015 at 05:37, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> Change the __m128i variables to be volatile so gcc 4.9 won't optimise
> all of them out with -O1 or greater. The _mm_set1_epi32/pinsrd calls
> still get optimised out but now there is at least one SSE4.1 instruction
> generated via _mm_max_epu32
11 matches
Mail list logo
