Re: [Mesa-dev] [Mesa-stable] [PATCH 2/2] auxiliary: use vl_drm_screen_create method for surfaceless

On 24 October 2017 at 02:26, Sharma, Deepak wrote: > Hi Emil, > > Is your suggestion is to build mesa in chrome using --with-platforms=drm and > --with-platforms=surfaceless both ? I am not sure if that is required for > chrome. > The approach we are taking here is to

Re: [Mesa-dev] [Mesa-stable] [PATCH 2/2] auxiliary: use vl_drm_screen_create method for surfaceless

Hi Emil, Is your suggestion is to build mesa in chrome using --with-platforms=drm and --with-platforms=surfaceless both ? I am not sure if that is required for chrome. The approach we are taking here is to build mesa only with --with-platforms=surfaceless and leverage existing VA_DISPLAY_DRM*

Re: [Mesa-dev] [Mesa-stable] [PATCH 2/2] auxiliary: use vl_drm_screen_create method for surfaceless

On 11 October 2017 at 07:13, Guttula, Suresh > wrote: > HI, > >>- why do we need "surfaceless" support >ChromeOS supports surfacelsess and we need this va enablement for > surfaceless in chromium. Ack, that should have been part of the

Re: [Mesa-dev] [Mesa-stable] [PATCH 2/2] auxiliary: use vl_drm_screen_create method for surfaceless

HI Suresh, Please try to avoid HTML emails. If that's not possible, make sure your reply is more readable. At the moment it has 3 different fonts and 3 different colours, which makes is distracting and hard to read. Please tweak the quoting format - older replies should be a level deeper. See

Re: [Mesa-dev] [Mesa-stable] [PATCH 2/2] auxiliary: use vl_drm_screen_create method for surfaceless

Hi Suresh, in general please don't use HTML mail (e.g. no color or bold formating etc.. in mails). Mailing list usually reject that, but Mesa isn't so strict with that so it hopefully works out. For more comments see below. Am 17.10.2017 um 08:36 schrieb Guttula, Suresh: On 11 October

Re: [Mesa-dev] [Mesa-stable] [PATCH 2/2] auxiliary: use vl_drm_screen_create method for surfaceless

On 11 October 2017 at 07:13, Guttula, Suresh wrote: > HI, > >>- why do we need "surfaceless" support >ChromeOS supports surfacelsess and we need this va enablement for > surfaceless in chromium. Ack, that should have been part of the commit message. >> - does

Re: [Mesa-dev] [Mesa-stable] [PATCH 2/2] auxiliary: use vl_drm_screen_create method for surfaceless

Hi Suresh, If I miss something here please provide some more details on the question. Emils question is if the "surfaceless" platform is identical to the "drm" platform why not use the drm platform in the first place? And yeah, that is a rather good question. Regards, Christian. Am

Re: [Mesa-dev] [Mesa-stable] [PATCH 2/2] auxiliary: use vl_drm_screen_create method for surfaceless

HI, >>- why do we need "surfaceless" support ChromeOS supports surfacelsess and we need this va enablement for surfaceless in chromium. >> - does upstream VAAPI has surfaceless platform Yes. It uses headless support of VA-API for decoding. - why is the surfaceless implementation

Re: [Mesa-dev] [Mesa-stable] [PATCH 2/2] auxiliary: use vl_drm_screen_create method for surfaceless

Hi Suresh, On 10 October 2017 at 07:20, sguttula wrote: > when display type is VA_DISPLAY_DRM_RENDERNODES and if > drm screen create method is not enabled then vscreen is > NULL. To fix this issue,this patch will enable > vl_drm_screen_create() for surfaceless platforms >