On Sat, 2019-06-15 at 07:38 +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> Am 14.06.2019 08:13, schrieb Jan Vesely:
> > On Thu, 2019-06-13 at 21:20 +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> > > Am 13.06.2019 07:10, schrieb Marek Olšák:
> > > > FYI, I just pushed the new linker.
> > > >
> > > > Marek
> > >
> > > Thank you
Am 14.06.2019 08:13, schrieb Jan Vesely:
On Thu, 2019-06-13 at 21:20 +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote:
Am 13.06.2019 07:10, schrieb Marek Olšák:
> FYI, I just pushed the new linker.
>
> Marek
Thank you very much Marek and _Nicolai_ for this GREAT stuff.
It brings back some speed after 1/8 drop with
On Thu, 2019-06-13 at 21:20 +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> Am 13.06.2019 07:10, schrieb Marek Olšák:
> > FYI, I just pushed the new linker.
> >
> > Marek
>
> Thank you very much Marek and _Nicolai_ for this GREAT stuff.
> It brings back some speed after 1/8 drop with glmark2, lately.
> Maybe my
Am 13.06.2019 07:10, schrieb Marek Olšák:
FYI, I just pushed the new linker.
Marek
Thank you very much Marek and _Nicolai_ for this GREAT stuff.
It brings back some speed after 1/8 drop with glmark2, lately.
Maybe my amd-staging-drm-next tree (5.2-rc1) didn't honor the kernel
mitigation
On Thu, 2019-06-13 at 01:10 -0400, Marek Olšák wrote:
> FYI, I just pushed the new linker.
thanks. I've checked the handling and the current approach works for
sections as well (even if not handled explicitly).
Jan
>
> Marek
>
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 10:39 PM Jan Vesely wrote:
>
> > Fixes
FYI, I just pushed the new linker.
Marek
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 10:39 PM Jan Vesely wrote:
> Fixes piglits:
> call.cl
> calls-larget-struct.cl
> calls-struct.cl
> calls-workitem-id.cl
> realign-stack.cl
> tail-calls.cl
>
> Cc:
