On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 04:06:05PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 23:03 +0100, Tom Stellard wrote:
I don't think we emit the int_AMDGPU_mul intrinsic anymore, but it probably
doesn't hurt to keep it around until we sort out all of the legacy vs
non-legacy
On Die, 2013-01-22 at 16:10 +0100, Tom Stellard wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 04:06:05PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 23:03 +0100, Tom Stellard wrote:
I don't think we emit the int_AMDGPU_mul intrinsic anymore, but it
probably
doesn't hurt to keep it around
From: Michel Dänzer michel.daen...@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer michel.daen...@amd.com
---
lib/Target/R600/SIInstructions.td | 10 ++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/Target/R600/SIInstructions.td
b/lib/Target/R600/SIInstructions.td
index 4164c55..01b61f7
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 04:40:47PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
From: Michel Dänzer michel.daen...@amd.com
I don't think we emit the int_AMDGPU_mul intrinsic anymore, but it probably
doesn't hurt to keep it around until we sort out all of the legacy vs non-legacy
instruction issues.
