On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 12:07 AM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> Hey Look. I'm actually reading your patch now!
>
> I read through the whole thing and over-all I think it looks fairly good.
>
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>
>> The
Hey Look. I'm actually reading your patch now!
I read through the whole thing and over-all I think it looks fairly good.
On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> The strategy is to just keep n anv_query_pool_slot entries per query
> instead of one. The
Looks like after nearly 3 months of no reviews that lead to R-b's[1],
this patch no longer applies to master. I'm abandoning it. If anyone's
interested, feel free to pick it up and make it your own.
Cheers,
-ilia
[1] Robert did look at it, but didn't have significant feedback or say
what I
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:04 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Robert Bragg wrote:
>> Depending on how strictly we consider that the queries should only
>> measure
>> the commands they bracket then I think some
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Robert Bragg wrote:
> Depending on how strictly we consider that the queries should only measure
> the commands they bracket then I think some stalling will be necessary to
> serialize the work associated with a query and defer
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Robert Bragg wrote:
>>> +/*
>>> + * GPR0 = GPR0 >> 2;
>>> + *
>>> + * Note that the upper 30 bits of GPR are lost!
>>> + */
>>> +static void
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Robert Bragg wrote:
>> +/*
>> + * GPR0 = GPR0 >> 2;
>> + *
>> + * Note that the upper 30 bits of GPR are lost!
>> + */
>> +static void
>> +shr_gpr0_by_2_bits(struct anv_batch *batch)
>> +{
>> +
Sorry for the delay responding here; some comments below...
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> 2-month ping. [ok, it hasn't been 2 months on the dot, but ... close.]
>
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> ping.
2-month ping. [ok, it hasn't been 2 months on the dot, but ... close.]
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> ping.
>
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> Ping? Any further comments/feedback/reviews?
>>
>>
>> On Dec
ping.
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> Ping? Any further comments/feedback/reviews?
>
>
> On Dec 5, 2016 11:22 AM, "Ilia Mirkin" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Robert Bragg wrote:
>>
>>
>> On
Ping? Any further comments/feedback/reviews?
On Dec 5, 2016 11:22 AM, "Ilia Mirkin" wrote:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Robert Bragg wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>
>> The strategy is to
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Robert Bragg wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>
>> The strategy is to just keep n anv_query_pool_slot entries per query
>> instead of one. The available bit is only valid in the last
On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> The strategy is to just keep n anv_query_pool_slot entries per query
> instead of one. The available bit is only valid in the last one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin
> ---
>
> I think this is in a
The strategy is to just keep n anv_query_pool_slot entries per query
instead of one. The available bit is only valid in the last one.
Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin
---
I think this is in a pretty good state now. I've tested both the direct and
buffer paths with a hacked up
14 matches
Mail list logo