On 2 February 2017 at 17:26, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> On Thursday, February 2, 2017 9:15:47 AM PST Chad Versace wrote:
>> On Thu 02 Feb 2017, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> > From: Emil Velikov
>> >
>> > They are versions of the respective libdrm
On Thursday, February 2, 2017 9:15:47 AM PST Chad Versace wrote:
> On Thu 02 Feb 2017, Emil Velikov wrote:
> > From: Emil Velikov
> >
> > They are versions of the respective libdrm package. They are _not_ the
> > version of libdrm[.so] required for driver X.
> >
> >
On Thu 02 Feb 2017, Emil Velikov wrote:
> From: Emil Velikov
>
> They are versions of the respective libdrm package. They are _not_ the
> version of libdrm[.so] required for driver X.
>
> Doing the latter will lead to combinatoric explosion and in all fairness
>
LGTM Reviewed-by: Plamena Manolova
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 2:32 AM, Emil Velikov
wrote:
> From: Emil Velikov
>
> They are versions of the respective libdrm package. They are _not_ the
> version of libdrm[.so]
From: Emil Velikov
They are versions of the respective libdrm package. They are _not_ the
version of libdrm[.so] required for driver X.
Doing the latter will lead to combinatoric explosion and in all fairness
things will likely be broken most of the time.
To make