On 25 May 2018 at 10:05, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-05-22 at 10:48 -0700, Dylan Baker wrote:
>> This looks good to me. I'm also opened to doing the 18.1.x releases if Emil
>> would rather not do them (and I have been updating my 18.1-proposed branch
>> either way).
>>
>
> I'm fine
On Tue, 2018-05-22 at 10:48 -0700, Dylan Baker wrote:
> This looks good to me. I'm also opened to doing the 18.1.x releases if Emil
> would rather not do them (and I have been updating my 18.1-proposed branch
> either way).
>
I'm fine if you do 18.1.x releases. In fact, I think it would be a good
On Tue, 2018-05-22 at 20:31 +0200, Andres Gomez wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-05-22 at 09:48 +0200, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
> > CC: Andres Gomez
> > CC: Emil Velikov
> > CC: Dylan Baker
> > ---spec.arb_texture_multisample.arb_texture_multisample
> >
> > As per calendar 18.2.0rc1 starts after the l
On Tue, 2018-05-22 at 09:48 +0200, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
> CC: Andres Gomez
> CC: Emil Velikov
> CC: Dylan Baker
> ---spec.arb_texture_multisample.arb_texture_multisample
>
> As per calendar 18.2.0rc1 starts after the last 18.1.x release, either
> we need to update the release calendar f
This looks good to me. I'm also opened to doing the 18.1.x releases if Emil
would rather not do them (and I have been updating my 18.1-proposed branch
either way).
Reviewed-by: Dylan Baker
Quoting Juan A. Suarez Romero (2018-05-22 00:48:48)
> CC: Andres Gomez
> CC: Emil Velikov
> CC: Dylan Bak
CC: Andres Gomez
CC: Emil Velikov
CC: Dylan Baker
---
As per calendar 18.2.0rc1 starts after the last 18.1.x release, either
we need to update the release calendar for 18.2 series, or extend 18.1
series.
docs/release-calendar.html | 34 +-
1 file changed, 5 in