Emil Velikov, le Mon 02 Feb 2015 18:24:29 +, a écrit :
Did you had the change to try the patch - does it cause issues on your
setup (build and/or runtime-wise) ?
My setup has neither HAVE_LIBDRM nor HAVE_DRM_PLATFORM so it can't break
it :)
Samuel
On 22/01/15 20:53, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Emil Velikov, le Thu 22 Jan 2015 16:52:06 +, a écrit :
On 14/01/15 19:36, Axel Davy wrote:
To fix build when libdrm is not found,
commit a594cec7e3ef275c386054127a357110a19dd823 did put several
parts of egl code under #ifdef HAVE_DRM_PLATFORM.
Emil Velikov, le Thu 22 Jan 2015 16:52:06 +, a écrit :
On 14/01/15 19:36, Axel Davy wrote:
To fix build when libdrm is not found,
commit a594cec7e3ef275c386054127a357110a19dd823 did put several
parts of egl code under #ifdef HAVE_DRM_PLATFORM.
HAVE_DRM_PLATFORM means the egl drm
On 14/01/15 19:36, Axel Davy wrote:
To fix build when libdrm is not found,
commit a594cec7e3ef275c386054127a357110a19dd823 did put several
parts of egl code under #ifdef HAVE_DRM_PLATFORM.
HAVE_DRM_PLATFORM means the egl drm platform is being built.
What should have been used instead is
To fix build when libdrm is not found,
commit a594cec7e3ef275c386054127a357110a19dd823 did put several
parts of egl code under #ifdef HAVE_DRM_PLATFORM.
HAVE_DRM_PLATFORM means the egl drm platform is being built.
What should have been used instead is HAVE_LIBDRM.
At a few locations, the
