On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> FWIW, r600 and radeonsi should return 8.
>
> Marek
Thanks, I'll send patches.
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 11:51 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> Of course none of this actually changes backends to return > 0 bits...
> did you mean to follow up with further patches?
Yes, I wanted to try to change GL_VIEWPORT_SUBPIXEL_BITS at least for
some drivers (r600, radeonsi, nouveau).
___
On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 11:51 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 7:47 AM, Józef Kucia wrote:
>> This allows Gallium drivers to advertise the subpixel precision
>> for floating point viewports bounds.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Józef Kucia
>> ---
>>
>> Currently all Mesa drivers return 0
On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 7:47 AM, Józef Kucia wrote:
> This allows Gallium drivers to advertise the subpixel precision
> for floating point viewports bounds.
>
> Signed-off-by: Józef Kucia
> ---
>
> Currently all Mesa drivers return 0 for GL_VIEWPORT_SUBPIXEL_BITS
> regardless whether floating poi
This allows Gallium drivers to advertise the subpixel precision
for floating point viewports bounds.
Signed-off-by: Józef Kucia
---
Currently all Mesa drivers return 0 for GL_VIEWPORT_SUBPIXEL_BITS
regardless whether floating point viewport bounds are supported.
From the ARB_viewport_array spec
