Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] gallium: add more exceptions to tgsi_util_get_inst_usage_mask

2017-10-19 Thread Marek Olšák
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák Marek On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 6:40 PM, Tim Rowley wrote: > A number of double/int64 operations don't have matching > read and write usage masks, which the fallthrough case of > tgsi_util_get_inst_usage_mask assumes for

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] gallium: add more exceptions to tgsi_util_get_inst_usage_mask

2017-10-19 Thread Roland Scheidegger
Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger Albeit the way those masks are derived looks quite error-prone in general (especially for new opcodes). Am 19.10.2017 um 18:40 schrieb Tim Rowley: > A number of double/int64 operations don't have matching > read and write usage masks, which

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] gallium: add more exceptions to tgsi_util_get_inst_usage_mask

2017-10-19 Thread Tim Rowley
A number of double/int64 operations don't have matching read and write usage masks, which the fallthrough case of tgsi_util_get_inst_usage_mask assumes for componentwise tagged instructions. No regressions in llvmpipe piglit; fixes a large number of swr regressions. ---