Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák
Marek
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 6:40 PM, Tim Rowley wrote:
> A number of double/int64 operations don't have matching
> read and write usage masks, which the fallthrough case of
> tgsi_util_get_inst_usage_mask assumes for
Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger
Albeit the way those masks are derived looks quite error-prone in
general (especially for new opcodes).
Am 19.10.2017 um 18:40 schrieb Tim Rowley:
> A number of double/int64 operations don't have matching
> read and write usage masks, which
A number of double/int64 operations don't have matching
read and write usage masks, which the fallthrough case of
tgsi_util_get_inst_usage_mask assumes for componentwise
tagged instructions.
No regressions in llvmpipe piglit; fixes a large number of
swr regressions.
---