The VERT_BIT_* defines are 64-bit values since commit
f364ac1da10ff67eba5196c1074aff579864f741, but the printf
was still expecting a simple int. This worked on little-endian
hosts because the values were still less than INT_MAX, but
probably would've gone bad and printed zero on big-endian ones.
On 12/09/2011 07:00 AM, nobled wrote:
The VERT_BIT_* defines are 64-bit values since commit
f364ac1da10ff67eba5196c1074aff579864f741, but the printf
was still expecting a simple int. This worked on little-endian
hosts because the values were still less than INT_MAX, but
probably would've gone
- Original Message -
On 12/09/2011 07:00 AM, nobled wrote:
The VERT_BIT_* defines are 64-bit values since commit
f364ac1da10ff67eba5196c1074aff579864f741, but the printf
was still expecting a simple int. This worked on little-endian
hosts because the values were still less than
On 12/09/2011 07:59 AM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
- Original Message -
On 12/09/2011 07:00 AM, nobled wrote:
The VERT_BIT_* defines are 64-bit values since commit
f364ac1da10ff67eba5196c1074aff579864f741, but the printf
was still expecting a simple int. This worked on little-endian
hosts
- Original Message -
On 12/09/2011 07:59 AM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
- Original Message -
On 12/09/2011 07:00 AM, nobled wrote:
The VERT_BIT_* defines are 64-bit values since commit
f364ac1da10ff67eba5196c1074aff579864f741, but the printf
was still expecting a simple