Thanks Eero!
On Tue, 2017-08-29 at 12:26 +0300, Eero Tamminen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 28.08.2017 17:33, Andres Gomez wrote:
> > Kenneth, would we want this patch in 17.1 or we shouldn't bother ?
>
> See this for more extensive info on its impact:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=
Hi,
On 28.08.2017 17:33, Andres Gomez wrote:
Kenneth, would we want this patch in 17.1 or we shouldn't bother ?
See this for more extensive info on its impact:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102272
(It's just performance. While it improves some cases, it regresses other
Kenneth, would we want this patch in 17.1 or we shouldn't bother ?
On Tue, 2017-05-30 at 16:28 -0700, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> As of 4.11, the kernel isn't bothering to set the subslice hashing mode
> on Apollolake, leaving it at the default of 8x8. (It initializes it to
> 16x4 on most platforms.
As of 4.11, the kernel isn't bothering to set the subslice hashing mode
on Apollolake, leaving it at the default of 8x8. (It initializes it to
16x4 on most platforms.)
Performance data for GPUTest Triangle on Apollolake at 1024x640:
X-tiled RT:
---
8x8 -> 16x4: 2.4325% +/- 0.