The commit message should be prefixed glsl:, this fix isn't
i965-specific.
Martin Peres martin.pe...@linux.intel.com writes:
This got missed because the piglit test only tested int images to avoid a
combinatiorial explosion of format, targets, stages and sizes which
takes more than 5 minutes
This got missed because the piglit test only tested int images to avoid a
combinatiorial explosion of format, targets, stages and sizes which
takes more than 5 minutes to test on nvidia's driver.
This patch also drops the IMAGE_FUNCTION_AVAIL_ATOMIC which is not applicable
to the image_size
On 21/08/15 16:52, Francisco Jerez wrote:
The commit message should be prefixed glsl:, this fix isn't
i965-specific.
Martin Peres martin.pe...@linux.intel.com writes:
This got missed because the piglit test only tested int images to avoid a
combinatiorial explosion of format, targets,
On 21/08/15 17:47, Martin Peres wrote:
On 21/08/15 16:52, Francisco Jerez wrote:
The commit message should be prefixed glsl:, this fix isn't
i965-specific.
Ilia just warned me on IRC that I completely missed this comment...
I guess the top-posting threw me off (even if it was entirely
