On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 01:33:24PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 20 April 2016 at 03:27, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 07:00:18PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> >> On 19 April 2016 at 04:03, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> >> > Any objections to this?
>
On 20 April 2016 at 03:27, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 07:00:18PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 19 April 2016 at 04:03, Jonathan Gray wrote:
>> > Any objections to this?
>> >
>> Absolutely none. I simply missed it.
>>
>> > On Mon, Dec 21,
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 07:00:18PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 19 April 2016 at 04:03, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> > Any objections to this?
> >
> Absolutely none. I simply missed it.
>
> > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 04:39:55PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> >> Use dev_node_from_fd()
On 19 April 2016 at 04:03, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> Any objections to this?
>
Absolutely none. I simply missed it.
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 04:39:55PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote:
>> Use dev_node_from_fd() with HAVE_LIBDRM to provide an implmentation
>> of
Any objections to this?
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 04:39:55PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> Use dev_node_from_fd() with HAVE_LIBDRM to provide an implmentation
> of loader_get_device_name_for_fd() for non-linux systems that
> use libdrm but don't have udev or sysfs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Gray
Use dev_node_from_fd() with HAVE_LIBDRM to provide an implmentation
of loader_get_device_name_for_fd() for non-linux systems that
use libdrm but don't have udev or sysfs.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Gray
---
src/loader/loader.c | 26 +-
1 file changed, 25