On 27/07/16 13:47, Alejandro Piñeiro wrote:
> On 26/07/16 22:16, Francisco Jerez wrote:
-- However that spec change would have the side effect of making
the CTS test you're trying to fix non-compliant...
>>> This would not be the first case of a CTS test that is not correct due
>>> the
On 26/07/16 22:16, Francisco Jerez wrote:
>
>>> -- However that spec change would have the side effect of making
>>> the CTS test you're trying to fix non-compliant...
>> This would not be the first case of a CTS test that is not correct due
>> the complexities/ambiguities of the OpenGL spec. Or
Alejandro Piñeiro writes:
> On 23/07/16 00:31, Francisco Jerez wrote:
>> Alejandro Piñeiro writes:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 15/07/16 22:46, Francisco Jerez wrote:
Alejandro Piñeiro writes:
> On 14/07/16 21:24,
On 23/07/16 00:31, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> Alejandro Piñeiro writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 15/07/16 22:46, Francisco Jerez wrote:
>>> Alejandro Piñeiro writes:
>>>
On 14/07/16 21:24, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> Alejandro Piñeiro
On 23/07/16 00:31, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> Alejandro Piñeiro writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 15/07/16 22:46, Francisco Jerez wrote:
>>> Alejandro Piñeiro writes:
>>>
On 14/07/16 21:24, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> Alejandro Piñeiro
Alejandro Piñeiro writes:
> Hi,
>
> On 15/07/16 22:46, Francisco Jerez wrote:
>> Alejandro Piñeiro writes:
>>
>>> On 14/07/16 21:24, Francisco Jerez wrote:
Alejandro Piñeiro writes:
> Without this commit, a image
Ping. Also including Ian Romanick on the conversation, as right now the
main question is about the spec.
The thread is somewhat messy, so in order to be clear, this is the last
patch I sent to the list (and the one Im proposing):
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/98877/
On 18/07/16 14:44,
Hi,
On 15/07/16 22:46, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> Alejandro Piñeiro writes:
>
>> On 14/07/16 21:24, Francisco Jerez wrote:
>>> Alejandro Piñeiro writes:
>>>
Without this commit, a image is considered valid if the level of the
texture bound to
Alejandro Piñeiro writes:
> On 14/07/16 21:24, Francisco Jerez wrote:
>> Alejandro Piñeiro writes:
>>
>>> Without this commit, a image is considered valid if the level of the
>>> texture bound to the image is complete, something we can check as mesa
On 14/07/16 21:24, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> Alejandro Piñeiro writes:
>
>> Without this commit, a image is considered valid if the level of the
>> texture bound to the image is complete, something we can check as mesa
>> save independently if it is "base incomplete" of
Alejandro Piñeiro writes:
> Without this commit, a image is considered valid if the level of the
> texture bound to the image is complete, something we can check as mesa
> save independently if it is "base incomplete" of "mipmap incomplete".
>
> But, from the OpenGL 4.3
Without this commit, a image is considered valid if the level of the
texture bound to the image is complete, something we can check as mesa
save independently if it is "base incomplete" of "mipmap incomplete".
But, from the OpenGL 4.3 Core Specification, section 8.25 ("Texture
Image Loads and
12 matches
Mail list logo