On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 2:43 AM, Timothy Arceri
wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-06-06 at 12:33 +0200, ⚛ wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Timothy Arceri
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I'm pretty sure someone told you this already. But you need to
>> > remove
>> > that symbol and just use your name. Note the s
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 2 June 2016 at 18:41, Jan Ziak (⚛) <0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> LTO compilation can sometimes fail with GCC 4.9 and GCC 5.3 because
>> src/mapi uses unusual mixing of C code and assembly code. The issue
>> may be present in case of G
On Mon, 2016-06-06 at 12:33 +0200, ⚛ wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Timothy Arceri
> wrote:
> >
> > I'm pretty sure someone told you this already. But you need to
> > remove
> > that symbol and just use your name. Note the symbol also seems to
> > be
> > casing your name to be removed
I only have /var/log/portage/elog/ the file(s) you specified don't exist on
my system
On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 at 21:13 ⚛ <0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 9:01 PM, Mike Lothian wrote:
> >
> > I'm running Gentoo too, it didn't take significantly longer to compile
> GCC 6.1 tha
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 9:01 PM, Mike Lothian wrote:
>
> I'm running Gentoo too, it didn't take significantly longer to compile GCC
> 6.1 than any other version of GCC
>
> I use portage to compile mesa
Ok. What is the output of a command like:
$ ls --sort=time /var/log/portage/media-libs:mesa-*.
I'm running Gentoo too, it didn't take significantly longer to compile GCC
6.1 than any other version of GCC
I use portage to compile mesa
On Mon, 6 Jun 2016, 5:58 p.m. ⚛, <0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Mike Lothian wrote:
> >
> > This doesn't seem to affect
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Mike Lothian wrote:
>
> This doesn't seem to affect me using GCC 6.1 and gold
I don't have GCC 6.1 installed at the moment, and it takes quite long
to install it on Gentoo.
Can you please send me the output of the following command?
$ cd mesa/src/mapi
$ make clea
On 6 June 2016 at 13:01, ⚛ <0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jan,
>>
>> Fwiw I fully agree on your point on outstanding patches.
>>
>> Now about this patch itself.
>>
>> On 2 June 2016 at 18:41, Jan Ziak (⚛) <0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com>
This doesn't seem to affect me using GCC 6.1 and gold
On Thu, 2 Jun 2016, 6:42 p.m. Jan Ziak (⚛), <0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> LTO compilation can sometimes fail with GCC 4.9 and GCC 5.3 because
> src/mapi uses unusual mixing of C code and assembly code. The issue
> may be present in case
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>
> Hi Jan,
>
> Fwiw I fully agree on your point on outstanding patches.
>
> Now about this patch itself.
>
> On 2 June 2016 at 18:41, Jan Ziak (⚛) <0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > LTO compilation can sometimes fail with GCC 4.9 and GCC 5.3
Hi Jan,
Fwiw I fully agree on your point on outstanding patches.
Now about this patch itself.
On 2 June 2016 at 18:41, Jan Ziak (⚛) <0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com> wrote:
> LTO compilation can sometimes fail with GCC 4.9 and GCC 5.3 because
> src/mapi uses unusual mixing of C code and assembly code.
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Timothy Arceri
wrote:
> I'm pretty sure someone told you this already. But you need to remove
> that symbol and just use your name. Note the symbol also seems to be
> casing your name to be removed in patchwork.
There's no causal relationship between a name and su
I'm pretty sure someone told you this already. But you need to remove
that symbol and just use your name. Note the symbol also seems to be
casing your name to be removed in patchwork.
On Mon, 2016-06-06 at 12:11 +0200, ⚛ wrote:
> Hello
>
> I would like to keep the number of lines displayed at
> h
Hello
I would like to keep the number of lines displayed at
http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/project/mesa/patches/?submitter=15850
to a low number.
0 is the best, 1 or 2 is meh...ok, 3+ is too much. Seeing 0 lines
allows me to move on and start working on the next patch.
From my viewpoint, the i
LTO compilation can sometimes fail with GCC 4.9 and GCC 5.3 because
src/mapi uses unusual mixing of C code and assembly code. The issue
may be present in case of GCC 6.1 as well.
This is a Mesa bug rather than a compiler bug (although in an ideal
world the compilation with -flto should fail if and
15 matches
Mail list logo
