Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák
Marek
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
> From: Nicolai Hähnle
>
> The spec actually says that calling EmitStreamVertex is undefined when
> you exceed max_vertices. But we do need to
On 07.12.2016 04:47, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 07/12/16 05:06 AM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
From: Nicolai Hähnle
The spec actually says that calling EmitStreamVertex is undefined when
you exceed max_vertices. But we do need to avoid trampling over memory
outside the GSVS
On 07/12/16 05:06 AM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
> From: Nicolai Hähnle
>
> The spec actually says that calling EmitStreamVertex is undefined when
> you exceed max_vertices. But we do need to avoid trampling over memory
> outside the GSVS ring.
Why "but"? It still works up
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan
On 12/07/2016 07:06 AM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
> From: Nicolai Hähnle
>
> The spec actually says that calling EmitStreamVertex is undefined when
> you exceed max_vertices. But we do need to avoid trampling
From: Nicolai Hähnle
The spec actually says that calling EmitStreamVertex is undefined when
you exceed max_vertices. But we do need to avoid trampling over memory
outside the GSVS ring.
Cc: mesa-sta...@lists.freedesktop.org
--
One more thing I noticed on top of all the