AFAICS, the R600 backend doesn't implement the intrinsics for R600.
Marek
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 3:53 AM, Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net wrote:
On 21.11.2014 06:21, Marek Olšák wrote:
From: Marek Olšák marek.ol...@amd.com
So far it has been compiled into pretty ugly code (8 instructions
On Nov 22, 2014, at 7:35 AM, Marek Olšák mar...@gmail.com wrote:
AFAICS, the R600 backend doesn't implement the intrinsics for R600.
Marek
Should it? It’s trivial to switch to these for it, but I wasn’t sure what the
actual semantics of its instructions were. There’s MAX and MAX_DX10,
The R600 LLVM support for graphics is disabled by default and is
missing some features. Unless somebody implements the missing
features, discussing how each TGSI instruction is compiled is fairly
low priority. We should rather be asking whether that project is
really dead. It's sad but true.
For
On 21.11.2014 06:21, Marek Olšák wrote:
From: Marek Olšák marek.ol...@amd.com
So far it has been compiled into pretty ugly code (8 instructions or so
for either opcode).
---
src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_shader.c | 7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git
From: Marek Olšák marek.ol...@amd.com
So far it has been compiled into pretty ugly code (8 instructions or so
for either opcode).
---
src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_shader.c | 7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_shader.c
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10:21:07PM +0100, Marek Olšák wrote:
From: Marek Olšák marek.ol...@amd.com
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard thomas.stell...@amd.com
So far it has been compiled into pretty ugly code (8 instructions or so
for either opcode).
---
src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_shader.c |
