On December 20, 2017 09:53:13 Emil Velikov wrote:
On 19 December 2017 at 18:05, Juan A. Suarez Romero
wrote:
When walking over all the cases in a OpSwitch, take in account the bitsize
of the literals to avoid getting wrong cases.
Even if
On 19 December 2017 at 18:05, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
> When walking over all the cases in a OpSwitch, take in account the bitsize
> of the literals to avoid getting wrong cases.
Even if there's no obvious tests that this fixes a stable and/or fixes
tag will be a good
Oops, thanks. Rb
On December 19, 2017 12:05:43 "Juan A. Suarez Romero"
wrote:
When walking over all the cases in a OpSwitch, take in account the bitsize
of the literals to avoid getting wrong cases.
---
src/compiler/spirv/vtn_cfg.c | 14 +++---
1 file
Sorry, sent twice the same patch.
J.A.
On Tue, 2017-12-19 at 19:05 +0100, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
> When walking over all the cases in a OpSwitch, take in account the bitsize
> of the literals to avoid getting wrong cases.
> ---
> src/compiler/spirv/vtn_cfg.c | 14 +++---
>
When walking over all the cases in a OpSwitch, take in account the bitsize
of the literals to avoid getting wrong cases.
---
src/compiler/spirv/vtn_cfg.c | 14 +++---
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/compiler/spirv/vtn_cfg.c b/src/compiler/spirv/vtn_cfg.c
When walking over all the cases in a OpSwitch, take in account the bitsize
of the literals to avoid getting wrong cases.
---
src/compiler/spirv/vtn_cfg.c | 14 +++---
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/compiler/spirv/vtn_cfg.c b/src/compiler/spirv/vtn_cfg.c