Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] st/nine: Drop USER_INDEX_BUFFERS check

2017-02-25 Thread Mike Lothian
Will do. On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 at 11:31 Edward O'Callaghan wrote: > oh yes I missed that, you want to have drop the negation in your patch > Mike. > > On 02/25/2017 10:28 PM, Mike Lothian wrote: > > I think my question regarding the double negative still stands. Is it

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] st/nine: Drop USER_INDEX_BUFFERS check

2017-02-25 Thread Edward O'Callaghan
oh yes I missed that, you want to have drop the negation in your patch Mike. On 02/25/2017 10:28 PM, Mike Lothian wrote: > I think my question regarding the double negative still stands. Is it > "!This->cmst_active" ot "This->cmst_active" > > On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 at 11:23 Edward O'Callaghan >

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] st/nine: Drop USER_INDEX_BUFFERS check

2017-02-25 Thread Mike Lothian
I think my question regarding the double negative still stands. Is it "!This->cmst_active" ot "This->cmst_active" On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 at 11:23 Edward O'Callaghan wrote: > From: Mike Lothian > > This fixes

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] st/nine: Drop USER_INDEX_BUFFERS check

2017-02-25 Thread Edward O'Callaghan
From: Mike Lothian This fixes 4a883966c1f74f43afc145d2c3d27af7b8c5e01a where the PIPE_CAP was removed. Now USER_INDEX_BUFFERS are always enabled remove the check and only check for cmst_active directly. v2: Axel pointed out the code was still needed when cmst was inactive,