Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] swr: invalidate attachment on transition change

+Bruce Andres, VTK/Kitware has already modified their code to enable dual depth peeling for Mesa version >= 17.2. From that perspective, it doesn’t matter if the change goes into the 17.1.x releases or 17.2. Having said that, we haven’t seen any issues with that check-in, so if it makes it

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] swr: invalidate attachment on transition change

George, would we want this patch in -stable or we shouldn't bother ? On Tue, 2017-06-20 at 11:42 -0500, George Kyriazis wrote: > Consider the following RT attachment order: > 1. Attach surfaces attachments 0 & 1, and render with them > 2. Detach 0 & 1 > 3. Re-attach 0 & 1 to different surfaces >

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] swr: invalidate attachment on transition change

Reviewed-by: Tim Rowley > On Jun 20, 2017, at 11:42 AM, George Kyriazis > wrote: Consider the following RT attachment order: 1. Attach surfaces attachments 0 & 1, and

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] swr: invalidate attachment on transition change

Consider the following RT attachment order: 1. Attach surfaces attachments 0 & 1, and render with them 2. Detach 0 & 1 3. Re-attach 0 & 1 to different surfaces 4. Render with the new attachment The definition of a tile being resolved is that local changes have been flushed out to the surface,