On 06/03/17 08:39, Grazvydas Ignotas wrote:
On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 10:29 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 11:14 AM, Grazvydas Ignotas wrote:
There are still some distributions trying to support unfortunate people
with old or exotic CPUs
On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 10:29 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 11:14 AM, Grazvydas Ignotas wrote:
>> There are still some distributions trying to support unfortunate people
>> with old or exotic CPUs that don't have 64bit atomic operations.
On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 11:14 AM, Grazvydas Ignotas wrote:
> There are still some distributions trying to support unfortunate people
> with old or exotic CPUs that don't have 64bit atomic operations. Missing
> 64bit atomic ops can be detected at compile time, so provide a 32bit
There are still some distributions trying to support unfortunate people
with old or exotic CPUs that don't have 64bit atomic operations. Missing
64bit atomic ops can be detected at compile time, so provide a 32bit
fallback and add an appropriate cache size limit ceiling for that case.
Bugzilla: