subject:"\[Mesa\-dev\] \[PATCH 0\/9\] st\/mesa state tracking rewrite"

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 0/9] st/mesa state tracking rewrite

2016-07-22 Thread Marek Olšák

Would anybody from VMWare like to comment? Marek On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Marek Olšák wrote: > Hi, > > This series rewrites state tracking in st/mesa. The advantages of the new > approach are described in the main patch. Here I'll just say it that it was > motivated by

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 0/9] st/mesa state tracking rewrite

2016-07-19 Thread Nicolai Hähnle

On 18.07.2016 15:11, Marek Olšák wrote: This series rewrites state tracking in st/mesa. The advantages of the new approach are described in the main patch. Here I'll just say it that it was motivated by a little inefficient code in st_validate_state and the mapping of _NEW_* flags to atoms. The

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 0/9] st/mesa state tracking rewrite

2016-07-18 Thread Marek Olšák

Hi, This series rewrites state tracking in st/mesa. The advantages of the new approach are described in the main patch. Here I'll just say it that it was motivated by a little inefficient code in st_validate_state and the mapping of _NEW_* flags to atoms. The new approach works with one ST_NEW_*