Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 02/23] i965: Use miptree non-aligned dimensions directly for x-tiled

2016-02-10 Thread Pohjolainen, Topi
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 12:31:11PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 06:51:22PM +0200, Topi Pohjolainen wrote: > > The logic in intel_miptree_create() uses the local copies > > for 64-byte aligned equivalent but only for stencil buffers which > > in turn are never x-tiled. This

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 02/23] i965: Use miptree non-aligned dimensions directly for x-tiled

2016-02-09 Thread Ben Widawsky
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 06:51:22PM +0200, Topi Pohjolainen wrote: > The logic in intel_miptree_create() uses the local copies > for 64-byte aligned equivalent but only for stencil buffers which > in turn are never x-tiled. This makes the logic a little more > explicit and helps to keep subsequent

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 02/23] i965: Use miptree non-aligned dimensions directly for x-tiled

2016-02-08 Thread Topi Pohjolainen
The logic in intel_miptree_create() uses the local copies for 64-byte aligned equivalent but only for stencil buffers which in turn are never x-tiled. This makes the logic a little more explicit and helps to keep subsequent patches easier to read. Signed-off-by: Topi Pohjolainen