Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 08/10] i965: Emit VF cache invalidates for 48-bit addressing bugs with softpin.

Kenneth Graunke writes: > We'd like to start using soft-pin to assign BO addresses up front, and > never move them again. Our previous plan for dealing with 48-bit VF > cache bugs was to relocate vertex buffers to the low 4GB, so we'd never > have addresses that alias in

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 08/10] i965: Emit VF cache invalidates for 48-bit addressing bugs with softpin.

Quoting Kenneth Graunke (2018-05-04 09:06:49) > On Thursday, May 3, 2018 11:49:51 PM PDT Chris Wilson wrote: > > Quoting Kenneth Graunke (2018-05-04 02:12:38) > > > We'd like to start using soft-pin to assign BO addresses up front, and > > > never move them again. Our previous plan for dealing

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 08/10] i965: Emit VF cache invalidates for 48-bit addressing bugs with softpin.

On Thursday, May 3, 2018 11:49:51 PM PDT Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Kenneth Graunke (2018-05-04 02:12:38) > > We'd like to start using soft-pin to assign BO addresses up front, and > > never move them again. Our previous plan for dealing with 48-bit VF > > cache bugs was to relocate vertex

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 08/10] i965: Emit VF cache invalidates for 48-bit addressing bugs with softpin.

Quoting Kenneth Graunke (2018-05-04 02:12:38) > We'd like to start using soft-pin to assign BO addresses up front, and > never move them again. Our previous plan for dealing with 48-bit VF > cache bugs was to relocate vertex buffers to the low 4GB, so we'd never > have addresses that alias in the

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 08/10] i965: Emit VF cache invalidates for 48-bit addressing bugs with softpin.

We'd like to start using soft-pin to assign BO addresses up front, and never move them again. Our previous plan for dealing with 48-bit VF cache bugs was to relocate vertex buffers to the low 4GB, so we'd never have addresses that alias in the low 32 bits. But that requires moving buffers