On 30/05/17 22:39, Rafael Antognolli wrote:
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 08:59:06PM +0100, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
The current way of handling groups doesn't seem to be able to handle
MI_LOAD_REGISTER_* with more than one register.
Hi Lionel, I don't think this is entirely true. I have added
On Tuesday, May 30, 2017 2:39:42 PM PDT Rafael Antognolli wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 08:59:06PM +0100, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
> > The current way of handling groups doesn't seem to be able to handle
> > MI_LOAD_REGISTER_* with more than one register.
Somewhat related, I fixed a bunch of
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 08:59:06PM +0100, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
> The current way of handling groups doesn't seem to be able to handle
> MI_LOAD_REGISTER_* with more than one register.
Hi Lionel, I don't think this is entirely true. I have added support to read
variable length structs on
The current way of handling groups doesn't seem to be able to handle
MI_LOAD_REGISTER_* with more than one register. This change reworks
the way we handle groups by building a traversal list on load the
GENXML files.
Let's say you have
Instruction {
Field0
Field1
Field2
Group0 (count=2)