Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 1/2] st/mesa: don't move ssbo after atomic buffers if we support hw atomics

2017-11-17 Thread Marek Olšák
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák Marek On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 3:05 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: > From: Dave Airlie > > There is no need to have these overlap if we support hw atomics. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie > --- >

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 1/2] st/mesa: don't move ssbo after atomic buffers if we support hw atomics

2017-11-16 Thread Ilia Mirkin
Reviewed-by: Ilia Mirkin On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 9:05 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > From: Dave Airlie > > There is no need to have these overlap if we support hw atomics. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie > --- >

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 1/2] st/mesa: don't move ssbo after atomic buffers if we support hw atomics

2017-11-16 Thread Dave Airlie
From: Dave Airlie There is no need to have these overlap if we support hw atomics. Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie --- src/mesa/state_tracker/st_atom_storagebuf.c | 8 +--- src/mesa/state_tracker/st_glsl_to_tgsi.cpp | 14 -- 2 files