Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 11/12] i965/cnl: Properly handle l3 configuration

2017-06-01 Thread Anuj Phogat
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 8:31 AM, Ben Widawsky wrote: > On 17-05-02 11:51:28, Francisco Jerez wrote: >> >> Anuj Phogat writes: >> >>> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote: >>> On 17-04-18 18:18:39, Francisco Jerez

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 11/12] i965/cnl: Properly handle l3 configuration

2017-05-11 Thread Ben Widawsky
On 17-05-02 11:51:28, Francisco Jerez wrote: Anuj Phogat writes: On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote: On 17-04-18 18:18:39, Francisco Jerez wrote: Most, if not all of the unrelated changes that snuck in were due to rebase. Anuj,

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 11/12] i965/cnl: Properly handle l3 configuration

2017-05-02 Thread Francisco Jerez
Anuj Phogat writes: > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote: > >> On 17-04-18 18:18:39, Francisco Jerez wrote: >> >> Most, if not all of the unrelated changes that snuck in were due to rebase. >> Anuj, would you mind fixing those? I tried

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 11/12] i965/cnl: Properly handle l3 configuration

2017-05-02 Thread Anuj Phogat
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote: > On 17-04-18 18:18:39, Francisco Jerez wrote: > > Most, if not all of the unrelated changes that snuck in were due to rebase. > Anuj, would you mind fixing those? I tried my best to address the rest, > but I'm > admittedly

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 11/12] i965/cnl: Properly handle l3 configuration

2017-04-25 Thread Anuj Phogat
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote: > On 17-04-18 18:18:39, Francisco Jerez wrote: > > Most, if not all of the unrelated changes that snuck in were due to rebase. > Anuj, would you mind fixing those? I tried my best to address the rest, > but I'm > admittedly

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 11/12] i965/cnl: Properly handle l3 configuration

2017-04-24 Thread Francisco Jerez
Ben Widawsky writes: > On 17-04-18 18:18:39, Francisco Jerez wrote: > > Most, if not all of the unrelated changes that snuck in were due to rebase. > Anuj, would you mind fixing those? I tried my best to address the rest, but > I'm > admittedly stumbling my way through some

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 11/12] i965/cnl: Properly handle l3 configuration

2017-04-24 Thread Ben Widawsky
On 17-04-18 18:18:39, Francisco Jerez wrote: Most, if not all of the unrelated changes that snuck in were due to rebase. Anuj, would you mind fixing those? I tried my best to address the rest, but I'm admittedly stumbling my way through some of the l3 programming. Anuj Phogat

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 11/12] i965/cnl: Properly handle l3 configuration

2017-04-18 Thread Francisco Jerez
Anuj Phogat writes: > From: Ben Widawsky > > V2: Squash the changes in one patch and rebased on master (Anuj). > > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky > Signed-off-by: Anuj Phogat > --- >

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 11/12] i965/cnl: Properly handle l3 configuration

2017-04-14 Thread Anuj Phogat
From: Ben Widawsky V2: Squash the changes in one patch and rebased on master (Anuj). Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky Signed-off-by: Anuj Phogat --- src/intel/common/gen_l3_config.c | 43