On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 08:28:38AM -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>On Sep 1, 2016 1:31 AM, "Pohjolainen, Topi"
><[1]topi.pohjolai...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 02:22:31PM -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>> > While it can be useful, the field has substantial
On Sep 1, 2016 1:31 AM, "Pohjolainen, Topi"
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 02:22:31PM -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > While it can be useful, the field has substantial limtations. In
> > particular, the bittom 2 or 3 bits is missing so your offset always has
to
>
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 02:22:31PM -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> While it can be useful, the field has substantial limtations. In
> particular, the bittom 2 or 3 bits is missing so your offset always has to
bottom
> be a multiple of 4 or 8. While surface alignments usually
While it can be useful, the field has substantial limtations. In
particular, the bittom 2 or 3 bits is missing so your offset always has to
be a multiple of 4 or 8. While surface alignments usually work out to make
this ok, when you start trying to fake compressed surfaces as uncompressed
(which