On 03/29/2016 03:01 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 03/29/2016 02:43 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
>> I ran these patches and the previous 2 through our CI, and there were no
>
> I take that back. GIT... was not my friend today. I'm trying it
> again... this time with the right bits.
Ugh. Something in
On 03/29/2016 02:43 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> I ran these patches and the previous 2 through our CI, and there were no
I take that back. GIT... was not my friend today. I'm trying it
again... this time with the right bits.
> regressions on Intel platforms. Both series (with v2 of patch 1 in th
I ran these patches and the previous 2 through our CI, and there were no
regressions on Intel platforms. Both series (with v2 of patch 1 in the
original) are
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick
Tested-by: Ian Romanick
On 03/29/2016 12:42 PM, Brian Paul wrote:
> No longer called from any other file.
> --
On 29/03/16 21:34, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
Am 29.03.2016 um 21:42 schrieb Brian Paul:
No longer called from any other file.
---
src/mesa/main/mipmap.c | 16
src/mesa/main/mipmap.h | 7 ---
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/mesa/main/m
Am 29.03.2016 um 21:42 schrieb Brian Paul:
> No longer called from any other file.
> ---
> src/mesa/main/mipmap.c | 16
> src/mesa/main/mipmap.h | 7 ---
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/mesa/main/mipmap.c b/src/mesa/main/mipmap.c
> in
No longer called from any other file.
---
src/mesa/main/mipmap.c | 16
src/mesa/main/mipmap.h | 7 ---
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/mesa/main/mipmap.c b/src/mesa/main/mipmap.c
index cb9afde..5ff53f4 100644
--- a/src/mesa/main/mipmap.c
++
No longer called from any other file.
---
src/mesa/main/mipmap.c | 16
src/mesa/main/mipmap.h | 7 ---
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/mesa/main/mipmap.c b/src/mesa/main/mipmap.c
index cb9afde..5ff53f4 100644
--- a/src/mesa/main/mipmap.c
++