On 20/10/17 16:54, Iago Toral wrote:
On Fri, 2017-10-20 at 13:18 +1100, Timothy Arceri wrote:
On 20/10/17 03:31, Iago Toral Quiroga wrote:
The existing code was checking the whole interface variable rather
than its members, which is not what we want: we want to check
aliasing for each
On Fri, 2017-10-20 at 13:18 +1100, Timothy Arceri wrote:
>
> On 20/10/17 03:31, Iago Toral Quiroga wrote:
> > The existing code was checking the whole interface variable rather
> > than its members, which is not what we want: we want to check
> > aliasing for each member in the interface
On 20/10/17 13:36, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:18 PM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
On 20/10/17 03:31, Iago Toral Quiroga wrote:
The existing code was checking the whole interface variable rather
than its members, which is not what we want: we want to
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:18 PM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
>
>
> On 20/10/17 03:31, Iago Toral Quiroga wrote:
>>
>> The existing code was checking the whole interface variable rather
>> than its members, which is not what we want: we want to check
>> aliasing for each member
On 20/10/17 03:31, Iago Toral Quiroga wrote:
The existing code was checking the whole interface variable rather
than its members, which is not what we want: we want to check
aliasing for each member in the interface variable.
Surprisingly, there are piglit tests that verify this and were
On 20/10/17 08:45, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
On 20/10/17 08:27, Timothy Arceri wrote:
On 20/10/17 08:19, Timothy Arceri wrote:
On 20/10/17 04:21, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Ilia Mirkin
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
>
>
> On 20/10/17 08:27, Timothy Arceri wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 20/10/17 08:19, Timothy Arceri wrote:
>>>
>>> On 20/10/17 04:21, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Ilia Mirkin
On 20/10/17 08:27, Timothy Arceri wrote:
On 20/10/17 08:19, Timothy Arceri wrote:
On 20/10/17 04:21, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Ilia Mirkin
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Iago Toral wrote:
On Thu, 2017-10-19
On 20/10/17 08:19, Timothy Arceri wrote:
On 20/10/17 04:21, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Ilia Mirkin
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Iago Toral wrote:
On Thu, 2017-10-19 at 12:37 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
Will this
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 5:19 PM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> On 20/10/17 04:21, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Ilia Mirkin
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Iago Toral wrote:
On
On 20/10/17 04:21, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Iago Toral wrote:
On Thu, 2017-10-19 at 12:37 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
Will this work with SSO shaders? Presumably the
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Iago Toral wrote:
>> On Thu, 2017-10-19 at 12:37 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>> Will this work with SSO shaders? Presumably the validation still has
>>> to happen, but
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Iago Toral wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-10-19 at 12:37 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> Will this work with SSO shaders? Presumably the validation still has
>> to happen, but I don't think cross_validate_outputs_to_inputs() will
>> end up getting called.
On Thu, 2017-10-19 at 12:37 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> Will this work with SSO shaders? Presumably the validation still has
> to happen, but I don't think cross_validate_outputs_to_inputs() will
> end up getting called.
The piglit tests I mention use SSO so it seems to be working for this.
See
Will this work with SSO shaders? Presumably the validation still has
to happen, but I don't think cross_validate_outputs_to_inputs() will
end up getting called.
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Iago Toral Quiroga wrote:
> The existing code was checking the whole interface
The existing code was checking the whole interface variable rather
than its members, which is not what we want: we want to check
aliasing for each member in the interface variable.
Surprisingly, there are piglit tests that verify this and were
passing due to a bug in the existing code: when we
16 matches
Mail list logo