Quoting Juan A. Suarez Romero (2018-10-24 09:32:07)
> On Wed, 2018-10-24 at 09:16 -0700, Dylan Baker wrote:
> > Quoting Juan A. Suarez Romero (2018-10-24 09:10:37)
> > > On Tue, 2018-10-23 at 15:56 -0700, Dylan Baker wrote:
> > > > There are two problems with the fixed patch. First, it fails to
On Wed, 2018-10-24 at 09:16 -0700, Dylan Baker wrote:
> Quoting Juan A. Suarez Romero (2018-10-24 09:10:37)
> > On Tue, 2018-10-23 at 15:56 -0700, Dylan Baker wrote:
> > > There are two problems with the fixed patch. First, it fails to create a
> > > dependency on the sourced .c file, so changes
Quoting Juan A. Suarez Romero (2018-10-24 09:10:37)
> On Tue, 2018-10-23 at 15:56 -0700, Dylan Baker wrote:
> > There are two problems with the fixed patch. First, it fails to create a
> > dependency on the sourced .c file, so changes to intel_tiled_memcpy.c
> > won't trigger a rebuild. It also
On Tue, 2018-10-23 at 15:56 -0700, Dylan Baker wrote:
> There are two problems with the fixed patch. First, it fails to create a
> dependency on the sourced .c file, so changes to intel_tiled_memcpy.c
> won't trigger a rebuild. It also doesn't get included in the dist
> tarball.
>
> CC: Tapani
Thanks for fixing these issues;
Reviewed-by: Tapani Pälli
On 10/24/18 1:56 AM, Dylan Baker wrote:
There are two problems with the fixed patch. First, it fails to create a
dependency on the sourced .c file, so changes to intel_tiled_memcpy.c
won't trigger a rebuild. It also doesn't get
There are two problems with the fixed patch. First, it fails to create a
dependency on the sourced .c file, so changes to intel_tiled_memcpy.c
won't trigger a rebuild. It also doesn't get included in the dist
tarball.
CC: Tapani Pälli
Fixes: 11b1afdc92db98e93f2ca50beeb7fc481a11e708
