On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Rowley, Timothy O
wrote:
> Ah, didn’t notice that they were all shifted by arrayIndex. Fine to leave
> the changes as they are, then.
>
> This series of four patches (or rather, the rebased versions in your repo)
> are Reviewed-by: Tim Rowley
Thanks, pushed!
Yo
Ah, didn’t notice that they were all shifted by arrayIndex. Fine to leave the
changes as they are, then.
This series of four patches (or rather, the rebased versions in your repo) are
Reviewed-by: Tim Rowley
mailto:timothy.o.row...@intel.com>>
On Nov 23, 2016, at 2:11 PM, Ilia Mirkin
mailto
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Rowley, Timothy O
wrote:
> This code seems to assume that all attached buffers have the same start
> layer, and that start will be zero. Maybe it should construct the clearMask
> inside the layer loop, which would also be a bit clearer than the code you
> added
This code seems to assume that all attached buffers have the same start layer,
and that start will be zero. Maybe it should construct the clearMask inside
the layer loop, which would also be a bit clearer than the code you added to
drop bits out of the mask?
-Tim
> On Nov 17, 2016, at 6:51 PM
Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin
---
With this patch, the layered-rendering clear tests pass, both with fast clear
enabled and disabled.
src/gallium/drivers/swr/swr_clear.cpp | 35 +--
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/s
